All Issue

2024 Vol.59, Issue 5 Preview Page

Research Article

31 October 2024. pp. 673-687
Abstract
References
1

강영옥, 2023, "GeoAI 활용 분야와 연구 동향," 대한지리학회지, 58(4), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.22776/kgs.2023.58.4.395.

10.22776/kgs.2023.58.4.395
2

국토교통부, 2008, 보행우선구역 표준설계매뉴얼, 세종.

3

김규리・이제선, 2016, "보행공간 요소에 대한 보행자의 인지 및 보행만족도에 관한 연구," 한국도시설계학회지 도시설계, 17(3), 89-103.

4

김성은・이제선, 2015, "대중교통전용지구 조성 사업 전후의 가로환경 및 보행자 만족도 변화에 관한 연구 - 서울시 서대문구 연세로 대중교통전용지구를 중심으로," 한국도시설계학회지, 16(2), 45-60.

5

김은정・김명연・이지민, 2017, "대구시 레드블록 프로젝트를 통해 본 보행친화적 가로환경정비사업의 성과와 과제," 도시행정학보, 30(3), 131-148.

10.36700/KRUMA.2017.09.30.3.131
6

박경훈・박종완・정성관・유주한, 2007, "걷기활동 증진을 위한 보행환경 평가지표의 개발," 한국환경과학회지, 16(11), 1231-1238.

10.5322/JES.2007.16.11.1231
7

박지영・강영옥・김지연, 2022, "거리 영상과 시멘틱 세그먼테이션을 활용한 보행환경 평가 지표 개발," 한국지도학회지, 22(1), 53-68.

10.16879/jkca.2022.22.1.053
8

안양시, 2017, 2030년 안양도시기본계획, 안양.

9

이경환・안건혁, 2008, "지역 주민의 보행 활동에 영향을 미치는 근린 환경 특성에 관한 실증 분석: 서울시 12개 행정동을 대상으로," 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계, 24 (6), 293-302.

10

이상규・이승지・황은경・이상호, 2001, "상업지역 가로 이용자 만족요인 분석에 관한 연구," 대한건축학회논문집, 17(9), 245-252.

11

이수기・고준호・이기훈, 2016, "근린환경특성이 보행만족도에 미치는 영향 분석," 국토계획, 51(1), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2016.02.51.1.169.

10.17208/jkpa.2016.02.51.1.169
12

이수기・이윤성・이창관, 2014, "보행자 연령대별 보행만족도에 영향을 미치는 가로환경의 특성 분석," 국토계획, 49(8), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2014.12.49.8.91.

10.17208/jkpa.2014.12.49.8.91
13

이지윤・강영옥・김지연・박지영, 2022, "기계학습을 이용한 보행환경 정성적 평가에 영향을 미치는 거리영상 특성분석," 한국지리학회, 11(3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.11.3.6.

10.25202/JAKG.11.3.6
14

행정안전부, 2012, 보행안전 및 편의증진에 관한 법률, 세종.

15

Asgarzadeh, M., Koga, T., Hirate, K., Farvid, M. and Lusk, A., 2014, Investigating oppressiveness and spaciousness in relation to building, trees, sky and ground surface: a study in Tokyo, Landscape & Urban Planning, 131, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.011.

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.011
16

Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A., Tampouraki, E. M. and Photis, Y. N., 2020, Is walkability equally distributed among downtowners? Evaluating the pedestrian streetscapes of eight European capitals using a micro-scale audit approach, International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 4, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V4-N1-75-92.

10.2495/TDI-V4-N1-75-92
17

Blečić, I., Cecchini, A. and Trunfio, G. A., 2018, Towards automatic assessment of perceived walkability, International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_24.

10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_24
18

Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, T., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J. and Houlsby, N., 2020, An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.11929.

19

Ewing, R. and Handy, S. L., 2009, Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability, Journal of Urban Design, 14, 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155.

10.1080/13574800802451155
20

Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Salis J. F., Chapman, J. and Saelems, B. E., 2005, Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001.

10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.00115694519
21

HAI (Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence), 2024, Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024, California.

22

Kang, Y., Kim, J., Park, J., and Lee, J., 2023, Assessment of perceived and physical walkability using street view images and deep learning technology, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(5), 186.

10.3390/ijgi12050186
23

Kim, S., Park, S., and Lee, J. S., 2014, Meso-or micro-scale? Environmental factors influencing pedestrian satisfaction, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 30, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.0050

10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.005
24

Li, X. and Ratti, C., 2018, Mapping the spatial distribution of shade provision of street trees in Boston using Google Street View panoramas, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31, 109-119. https://doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.013.

10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.013
25

Li, Y., Yabuki, N., Fukuda, T. and Zhang, J., 2020, A big data evaluation of urban street walkability using deep learning and environmental sensors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Berlin, Germany, 2, 319-328.

10.52842/conf.ecaade.2020.2.319
26

Lu, Y., Sarkar, C. and Xiao, Y., 2018, The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: evidence from Hong Kong, Social Science & Medicine, 208, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022.

10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.02229758477
27

Mateo-Babiano, I., 2016, Pedestrian's needs matter: examining Manila's walking environment, Transport Policy, 45, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008.

10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008
28

Nagata, S., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., Amagasa, S., Kikuchi, H., and Inoue, S., 2020, Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of Google Street View images, Health & Place, 66, 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428.

10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.10242832977303
29

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaise, L. and Polosukhin, I., 2017, Attention is All you Need, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762.

30

Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J. M. and Luo, P., 2021, SegFormer: simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 12077-12090.

31

Zhou, H., He, S., Cai, Y., Wang, M. and Su, S., 2019, Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning, Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101605.

10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Geographical Society
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한지리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한지리학회지
  • Volume : 59
  • No :5
  • Pages :673-687
  • Received Date : 2024-09-09
  • Revised Date : 2024-10-21
  • Accepted Date : 2024-10-21